Or one too many mulligans?
(the rough, the fairway or the green)
David Horsey: "without green being a factor in making us see red."
Horsey's cartoon goes overboard on voters
At the risk of being obvious, I would like to comment on David
Horsey's "Red & Blue America" (May 19). For the sake of humor, it went
overboard in its characterizations of those who voted for George W. Bush or Al
Gore. I hope it is a good thing if people realize, like I did, how we can see
one side funnier or less overboard than the other.
I hope the humor can
be less dividing than the colors pinned on Gore and Bush. It also made me
realize that there may be value in using more colors, but somehow
without green being a factor in making us see red.
[Personal Note: See bold and italics bold. For apparently the italicized irony, "green" was replaced by "colors" by the editors.] Not to condi send but, Nader was a factor along with chads.
More on Boehner and jobs later. i.e. the success and pop(ularity) of congress
Showing posts with label Jobs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jobs. Show all posts
Friday, January 24, 2014
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
CU T-party
By Buy[!]
Not just to be cute, but a recent poll shows the public priorities are Jobs over Cuts in spending,
as suggested by Ryan Grimm in the Job #1 segment of Rev. Al Sharpton's MSNBC show*.
Sea-U Later.
This almost makes a documentary of a mocumentary. There was the "domino theory" and "love it or leave it"... but Vietnam and Outsourcing have put a whole new spin on such slogans. I think that Water World and the Pacific Gyre would just about unspin and recreate the Libertarian Elba.
*(7 to 8 minute mark)
[Note that the narrative holds.]
[Inserted between comments 1 & 2:Retracing the anachronism of this post...the original inspirations was a mixed label/metaphor(yet to be found), that morphs the party of cuts, with the T-Party.
(Inserted post comment 2)Let alone the QE2 pun and the Hayek/Keynes Canard lines or anchors. Post c3- Or Bouts.]
Not just to be cute, but a recent poll shows the public priorities are Jobs over Cuts in spending,
as suggested by Ryan Grimm in the Job #1 segment of Rev. Al Sharpton's MSNBC show*.
Sea-U Later.
This almost makes a documentary of a mocumentary. There was the "domino theory" and "love it or leave it"... but Vietnam and Outsourcing have put a whole new spin on such slogans. I think that Water World and the Pacific Gyre would just about unspin and recreate the Libertarian Elba.
*(7 to 8 minute mark)
[Note that the narrative holds.]
[Inserted between comments 1 & 2:Retracing the anachronism of this post...the original inspirations was a mixed label/metaphor(yet to be found), that morphs the party of cuts, with the T-Party.
(Inserted post comment 2)Let alone the QE2 pun and the Hayek/Keynes Canard lines or anchors. Post c3- Or Bouts.]
Thursday, June 23, 2011
Over Helming.
[6-24-11 The lack of pomp and need for circumstance*(or circumdecision?)
President Obama on the Way Forward in Afghanistan(video)
Just an aftergoogle. But I will add that Randi Rhodes gave an impressive perspective on the President's remarks, not necessarily here, but it is reflected a bit in the video of the Democrats bringing it home.]
Please note the navigational metaphor in Professor John Kay's interview in the context of Professor Ha-Joon Chang's interview and the Bib Leo File of Republic Cons.
Inter-Dimentionalism and Ge Oh Metricks not so aside: The 6Sigma of Newt needs a pinnacle of purpose. i.e. there truly needs to be a navigational approach. Not akin to "rocket science"**, but having an aim and the model to chart it. My point is that 6 Sigma does not have a point, or rather a point is needed a priori for it to work. Actually it is not about the 6 edges of a tetrahedron, but the break down of the bell curve. If it were only about the bell curve it might have a point. My point is that politics has a point of balancing power and processing the point. But from a freedom perspective is that a goal? But from a navigational perspective there is a need for a 3D grid plus time and processing. The six edges of a tetradedron reflect the 4D dynamics of the process, that is not the goal. The goal is out there, the dream or unrealized principles if you will. The balance or base is the Try Angle*** and dynamics of Physics, Psychology and Philosophy(also processes as well as subjects) for realizing our balance of powers and dreams.
* an after link: NY Times from Randi Rhodes Blog
(also TPM)
** after bolds(4) in original post
*** pun on 3 points determine a plane(and tripod) but a 4th point determines 3 dimensions. Not to mention the Geo of Risk and Robustness of Nassim Taleb. He must not be taken out of context. Reducing debt does not mean reducing spending and economics is not the most efficient determinant. "(nature) it seems very inefficient for an economist but it is robust"(...)"I want society...to be more robust and more open to up side." My only point is that society(politics see "science" bold following "rocket") has a place in determining the rules that provide the circumstances.]
President Obama on the Way Forward in Afghanistan(video)
Just an aftergoogle. But I will add that Randi Rhodes gave an impressive perspective on the President's remarks, not necessarily here, but it is reflected a bit in the video of the Democrats bringing it home.]
Please note the navigational metaphor in Professor John Kay's interview in the context of Professor Ha-Joon Chang's interview and the Bib Leo File of Republic Cons.
Inter-Dimentionalism and Ge Oh Metricks not so aside: The 6Sigma of Newt needs a pinnacle of purpose. i.e. there truly needs to be a navigational approach. Not akin to "rocket science"**, but having an aim and the model to chart it. My point is that 6 Sigma does not have a point, or rather a point is needed a priori for it to work. Actually it is not about the 6 edges of a tetrahedron, but the break down of the bell curve. If it were only about the bell curve it might have a point. My point is that politics has a point of balancing power and processing the point. But from a freedom perspective is that a goal? But from a navigational perspective there is a need for a 3D grid plus time and processing. The six edges of a tetradedron reflect the 4D dynamics of the process, that is not the goal. The goal is out there, the dream or unrealized principles if you will. The balance or base is the Try Angle*** and dynamics of Physics, Psychology and Philosophy(also processes as well as subjects) for realizing our balance of powers and dreams.
* an after link: NY Times from Randi Rhodes Blog
(also TPM)
** after bolds(4) in original post
*** pun on 3 points determine a plane(and tripod) but a 4th point determines 3 dimensions. Not to mention the Geo of Risk and Robustness of Nassim Taleb. He must not be taken out of context. Reducing debt does not mean reducing spending and economics is not the most efficient determinant. "(nature) it seems very inefficient for an economist but it is robust"(...)"I want society...to be more robust and more open to up side." My only point is that society(politics see "science" bold following "rocket") has a place in determining the rules that provide the circumstances.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)